In the intricate world of legal battles, a menacing phenomenon has emerged — runaway jury verdicts in medical malpractice cases. These colossal judgments, often directed at the medical establishment, represented by the defendant — cast a shadow over the health industry as a whole.
With the stage set by the governments handling of the pandemic, social inflation becomes a powerful force, with the ability to reshape the landscape of medical malpractice litigation.
The Unseen Fallout: Social Inflation’s Ripple in Medical Malpractice
When unfortunate medical conditions, , a complex healthcare system, and jurors with a welfare-mindset converge, the outcome can be a staggering verdict that reverberates through the medical community. We saw a number of such verdicts in 2023, including a landmark decision in May, with a Pennsylvania jury granting $183 million to the family of a boy born with brain injuries due to a delayed C-section, at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania.The largest award to a single plaintiff in the state’s history.
Other significant awards include:
- $43.5 million awarded to former a NFL player, who sued for complications after surgery.
- $29,715,077 granted to an Iowa couple in a case for birth injuries leading to brain damage.
- $25 million awarded to a man in after a leg injury resulted in a below-the-knee amputation.
- $34 million granted to a Baltimore family following brain damage from an emergency C-section.
- $31 million awarded to a Michigan family involving brain damage after a delayed C-section.
- $19 million granted to a Minnesota family suing Essentia Health for neglect.
These judgments, often born out of juror activism , seek to make an example of medical organizations, with excessive damages aiming to punish them and ostensibly prevent similar perceived mishandling of crises in the future.
The Pandemic as Catalyst: Anger and Social Inflation
The handling of the recent pandemic has contributed to societal discontent, which finds an outlet in the courtroom drama of medical malpractice cases. This discontent has become a driving force behind the surge in runaway verdicts. Social inflation, in this context, is not just about monetary values; it embodies the collective emotional response seeking retribution for perceived wrongs.
Navigating the Insurance Dilemma
The palpable impact of runaway verdicts extends to the insurance sector, where providers grapple with the transfer of risk. The rising cost of substantial verdicts places an immense strain on both insureds and insurers alike.
The exponential increase in these judgments and the sensation that surrounds them leads to elevated insurance rates and a contraction in capacity.
Strategies for Course Correction: A Nuanced Approach
To move to reverse this trend, some legal analysts believe a nuanced approach is imperative. With defense strategies in medical malpractice cases moving away from complete denial —to demonstrate Instead; a willingness to accept reasonable responsibility, substantiated by facts and calculations— a more balanced outcome is likely.
Humanizing medical organizations becomes paramount, shedding light on the individuals behind the healthcare facade who contribute to communities and add value to patients’ lives. The use of what’s known as ‘Reverse Reptile Theory’, acknowledging shared responsibilities for safety by both parties; can counteract the emotional sway that often tips the scales toward colossal verdicts.
Addressing damages appropriately also involves providing the jury with a more reasonable anchor number early in the process. This not only counters emotional demands but also underscores the importance of a factual assessment over emotional responses.
In essence, the challenge posed by runaway jury verdicts in medical malpractice, fueled by social inflation, necessitates a recalibration of legal strategies. By acknowledging the emotional and logical dimensions of the human psyche, coupled with a nuanced defense approach, the health industry may see a shift towards more equitable and just outcomes.
insurance for allied health care
insurance for hospitals
Hospital Insurance typically covers all or part of the potential liability for hospital services. It includes medical malpractice, accidents involving hospital employees and equipment, care during surgery or any other invasive treatment, after-hours care arrangements by staff who need help with their children and more.
insurance for long term care facilities
Long term care facilities must protect themselves against potential liability arising from incidents within their facility. Westwood can help you negotiate a package tailored to your long term care facility client.
insurance for medical providers
traditional insurance products
Westwood have fostered exceptional relationships with underwriters and we go to great lengths to keep abreast of their latest products, changes in requirements and restrictions, including having weekly calls with the carriers, which you can see here, by joining our insurance insider group.
- Professional Liability Insurance (Medical Malpractice Insurance)
- General Liability Insurance
- Business Owner’s Policy (BOP Insurance)
- Excess and umbrella coverage
- Cyber Liability Insurance
- Telemedicine Malpractice Insurance
- Commercial Property Insurance
- Commercial Auto Insurance
- Directors and Officers Liability (D&O) insurance
- Sexual Abuse & Molestation (SAM) insurance
- Workers’ Compensation Insurance
- RAC Audit Coverage
- Errors & Omissions Insurance
- Employment Practices Liability
- Environmental Liability insurance
- HNO Insurance
- Fully/Partially Funded insurance
- Crime Insurance
Westwood President, Michael Richards has extensive experience in setting up alternative structures for larger clients. Here are some examples:
- Starting a Single Parent Captive (Pure captive)
- Joining a Protected Cell Captive (Segregated Cell)
- Micro Captive Insurance
- Group Captive Insurance
- Risk Retention Group (RRG)
- Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) Captive
- Stand alone ERP (extended reporting period)
- Loss Portfolio Transfers (LPTs)
If you think your client could be large and stable enough to benefit from starting or participating in a captive or has a special need for another alternative structure, contact Michael Richards now by phone: 855 351 7487.